Showing 3 results for Retrofitting
M. Mohamamdi Ghazimahalleh, R. M. Ghazimahalleh,
Volume 11, Issue 3 (9-2013)
Abstract
A new type of infilled frame has been recently proposed. It has a frictional sliding fuse, horizontally installed at the mid-height of the infill. It has already shown that such infilled frames have higher ductility, strength and damping ratio as well as more enhanced hysteresis cycles, compared with regular infilled frames. This experimental paper is focused on the influence of gravitational load on the behaviour of the fused infill panel. Furthermore, a repairing method in which damaged specimens are repaired by grout plasters is also studied. The results show that the gravitational load, applied to the surrounding frame of the infill for the dead or live loads, arises the ultimate strength of the fused infill specimens. It is also shown that repairing the failed specimen by grout was so efficient that the repaired specimen had greater strength than the original one. However, top gap, between the infill and the top beam of the enclosing frame should be absolutely avoided, because it decays the ultimate strength.
S.m. Zahrai,
Volume 13, Issue 3 (9-2015)
Abstract
Seismic retrofit of masonry slabs in existing steel or masonry buildings has found special significance in current codes as
failure of unstable jack arch slabs has been reported as a major reason for collapsing structures in Middle East deadly
earthquakes. In this paper, three retrofit schemes are investigated and compared. The proposed rehabilitation techniques
consist of a single X strapping, SXS, a double X strapping, DXS, and a two-way jack arch slab supported by a steel grid. Using
experimental studies, advantages and disadvantages of each scheme are evaluated. In-plane stiffness and capacity of the
diaphragm are adopted as the seismic performance index of each rehabilitation scheme.
According to the obtained results, the jack arch slab systems designed and constructed based on proposed retrofit methods
provide an appropriate alternative to other forms of flooring in seismic zones. DXS can greatly improve diaphragm
performance in terms of in-plane stiffness, capacity and even energy dissipation of the diaphragm compared with the other two
techniques. The second place belongs to SXS while the steel grid scheme has a minor effect on the in-plane stiffness of the
diaphragm.
Mahnoosh Biglari, Iman Ashayeri, Mohammad Bahirai,
Volume 14, Issue 6 (9-2016)
Abstract
In this article, general procedures for vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of a generic seismically designed bridge are outlined and the bridge’s damage criteria for blast resistance are explained. The generic concrete bridge is modeled and analyzed with the finite element technique implemented in ANSYS LS-DYNA environment and explosion threats are categorized into three main levels. Uncoupled dynamic technique is adopted to apply the blast loads on the bridge structure, damage and performance levels are resulted based on quantitatively verified damage mechanisms for the bridge members. The results show that, amongst different loading scenarios, the explosions that happen under deck are more critical comparing to blasts initiating from over deck sources. Furthermore, two retrofitting methods 1) concrete filled steel tube (CFST) and 2) concrete jacket are applied on the bridge columns. The program AUTODYN is used with coupled dynamic analysis of a column to compare the effectiveness of each method. Afterward, more efficient method for a column is applied to the whole bridge and its efficiency is revaluated. It is shown that CFST can decrease concrete spall, scabbing, rotation, displacements and shear forces more than the concrete jacket. Considering the proposed damage and performance levels, the bridge retrofitted with CFST reacts with lower damage level and higher performance level to blast loads.