Volume 28, Issue 1 (IJIEPR 2017)                   IJIEPR 2017, 28(1): 75-84 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

MirShojaee H, Masoumi B, Zeinali E. Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm for Automatic Extractive Text Summarization . IJIEPR 2017; 28 (1) :75-84
URL: http://ijiepr.iust.ac.ir/article-1-722-en.html
1- Department of Computer and information technology Engineering, Qazvin branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2- Department of Computer and information technology Engineering, Qazvin branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran , .
Abstract:   (5453 Views)

    Given the increasing number of documents, sites, online sources, and the users’ desire to quickly access information, automatic textual summarization has caught the attention of many researchers in this field. Researchers have presented different methods for text summarization as well as a useful summary of those texts including relevant document sentences. This study selects extractive method out of different summarizing methods (e.g. abstract method). Extractive method involves summarizing text through objective extraction of some parts of a text like word, sentence, and paragraph. A summarization issue would be unsolvable by exact methods in a reasonable time with considering documents with high amount of information (NP complete). These kinds of issues are usually solved using metaheuristic methods. A biogeography-based optimization algorithm (BBO), which is a new metaheuristic method in the domain of extractive text summarization, is used in this article. 

Full-Text [PDF 816 kb]   (1961 Downloads)    

Highlights:

  • Text summarization, using metaheuristic Biogeography-Based Optimization (BBO) algorithm with a focus on extractive features of texts.
  • Implementation of Biogeography-Based Optimization (BBO) on standard 100,200,400 -word documents DUC2002. 
  • Comparison of the proposed method with other methods indicates that evaluation of precision, recall, and score show more improvement than those in the GA, PSO, BFOA  methods.


Type of Study: Research | Subject: Optimization Techniques
Received: 2017/03/6 | Accepted: 2017/06/11 | Published: 2017/06/18

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.