Volume 9, Issue 3 (9-2021)
JRIA 2021, 9(3): 81-114 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Motahar R, Jalilisadrabad S, Alizadeh R. Comparative comparison of New and Old Neighborhoods Based on Identity (Islamic-Iranian) in Urban Planning
(Case Study: Hakimieh and Narmak in Tehran). JRIA 2021; 9 (3) :81-114
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1419-en.html
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1419-en.html
Abstract: (5462 Views)
Neighborhood identity means having a tendency and belonging to the neighborhood community.
Continuation of urban life is the reason for the neighborhood`s importance in the social and psychological development of urban dwellers. Therefore, the neighborhood is the physical crystallization of the community, and its borders are the crystallization of the sanctuaries. The comparison shows that the past neighborhoods had a well-structured structure and strengthened the neighborhood identity, but the new neighborhoods first define the neighborhood`s structure with towers and apartments that have populated the population from all over Iran. The purpose of this study is to identify the criteria affecting the identity of neighborhoods according to current conditions and a comparative comparison between the old and new neighborhoods of Narmak and Hakimiyeh based on these criteria in order to promote Islamic identity.
Continuation of urban life is the reason for the neighborhood`s importance in the social and psychological development of urban dwellers. Therefore, the neighborhood is the physical crystallization of the community, and its borders are the crystallization of the sanctuaries. The comparison shows that the past neighborhoods had a well-structured structure and strengthened the neighborhood identity, but the new neighborhoods first define the neighborhood`s structure with towers and apartments that have populated the population from all over Iran. The purpose of this study is to identify the criteria affecting the identity of neighborhoods according to current conditions and a comparative comparison between the old and new neighborhoods of Narmak and Hakimiyeh based on these criteria in order to promote Islamic identity.
Findings show that the differences in the criteria of cognition and awareness, sense of belonging, satisfaction, independence, environmental suitability, religion, civilization, territory, and unity in these neighborhoods are significant and real. Due to the implementation of renovation projects in The Hakimiyeh, in terms of affecting the social structure and people's sense of belonging to the region and local identity, it has acted poorly, reducing social capital and people's sense of belonging to the place of residence. The Narmak, despite the changes that have taken place in its physical texture, and has been formed according to a codified urban plan, but the residents of this neighborhood still experience a relatively large sense of spatial identity. The difference between the criteria of readability, social interactions and culture in Hakimiyeh and Narmak neighborhoods with different physical and social characteristics is not signi_cant and real. Therefore, it can be said that the texture renovation project of The Hakimieh has had acceptable results in terms of structure and physics. Finally, was found that due to the significance level (sig) less than 0.05 and the upper and lower limits of these two neighborhoods with a 95% confidence level were found that the average score of neighborhood identity criteria in the old neighborhood of The Narmak more than the new neighborhood and New is Wisdom.
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Comparative analysis of philosophy, art and architectural schools with Islamic thought
Received: 2021/01/14 | Accepted: 2021/04/3 | Published: 2021/09/22
Received: 2021/01/14 | Accepted: 2021/04/3 | Published: 2021/09/22
References
1. Abel, Ch. (1997). Architecture & Identity, toward a global eco- culture. MA:Architecture press, Oxford.
2. Adab, M. (2014). Meaning in the place of studying the effective components in the formation of spatial
3. Alexander, Christopher. (1965). A City is Not a Tree, In: G. Bell & J. Tyrwhitt (Eds) (1992) Human Identity in the Urban Environment, London: Penguin.
4. Alsayyad, N.(2001) .Hybrid culture/ Hybird urbanism:pandora s box of the third place in:Nezar Alsayyad(Ed) Hybird urbanism on the identity discourse and the built environment .praeger publihers.
5. AtashinBar, M. (2009). The Continuity of Identity in Urban Landscape. Bagh-e Nazar Journal, 6(12), 45-56. [in Persian].
6. Bocock, R (1992): Consumption and Lifestyles: Cambridge Polity. [DOI:10.4324/9780203313114]
7. Bradley, H (1996), Fractured Identities: Changing Patterns of Inequality, 1th Editation, Polity Press.
8. Brown-Saracino, Japonica, and Jeffey Nathaniel Parker. 2017. "What is up with My Sisters? Where are You?' The-Crood, S (1992): Postmodernization. London: Sage.
9. Cuneo, P. (2005). The History of Urban Development in the Islamic World. (Translation, Saeid Tizghalam zonozi). Tehran: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Urban Development Organization. 468.
10. Donboli S, Kalantari Khalilabad H, Aghasafari A (2019), Recognition of Urbanscape Identity Components in Iranian Islamic Cities- The case of Tehran, Naqshejahan, Basic studies and New Technologies Of Architecture and Planning, Valume 8, Issue 4, Pp 223-230.
11. Dougherty, D. L. (2006). Embodying the City: Identity and Use in Urban Public Space. Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture.
12. Ernawati, Jenny, (2018). Dimensions underlying place identity for sustainable urban development, MATTER: International Journal of Science and Technology, ISSN 2454-5880, Volume 3 Issue 3, Pp 271-285. [DOI:10.20319/mijst.2018.33.271285]
13. Foth,Marcus (2004) , Desgning networks for sustainable neighbourhoods (Acase study of a student a par tment com plex ) ,http : // eprints . qup . edu. ac /archive / foth . pdf . pp:8-9.
14. Ganji Jameh Shouran, Farzaneh, Amir Shah Bande, Somayeh & Gheibi, Shamin, (2016). Investigating the Factors Affect Individual's Attachment to place, International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol 3, No 12, Pp 11-19, ISSN 2454-3896.
15. Germond-Duret Celine (2016), Tradition and modernity: an obsolete dichotomy? Binary thinking, indigenous peoples and normalization, Third World Quarterly, Volume 37, Issue 9, Published online: 17 Feb, pp 1537-1558. [DOI:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135396]
16. Giddens, Anthony (2010), Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.-Bocock, R (1992), Consumption and Lifestyles: Cambridge Polity.
17. Griffin JN, De La Haye KL, Hawkins SJ, Thompson RC, Jenkins SR (2008), Predator diversity and ecosystem functioning: Density modifies the effect of resource partitioning, Ecology, Valume 89, Issue 2, Pp 298-305. [DOI:10.1890/07-1220.1]
18. Haapla, A (2004), The Urban Identuty: The City As a Place to Dwel. Tallinn: Estonian of Arts.
19. Hall, S (1992), The Question of Cultural Identity in (eds) S. Hall. D. Held. And T. Mc Grew. Modernity and Its Fulure The Open University. Press.
20. Jenkins, Richard (2008), Rethinking Ethnicity: Arguments and Explorations, London: SAGE.
21. Kaltenborn, B. P, & Williams, D. R, (2002), The meaning of place: Attachments to Femundsmarka National Journal of Geography, 56(3), 189-198. [DOI:10.1080/00291950260293011]
22. Koheler. G (2000), The Demons of Difference and Ethos of Understanding about Cultural Policy, in Swiss (1958) Federal Dffice of Culture.
23. Lewicka, Maria (2008).,Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past, Journal of Environmental Psychology 28 (2008) 209˚231. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001]
24. Lewikca, Maria (2010), What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of Place Scale on Place Attachment, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 30, Issue 1, Pp 35-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.004]
25. Mihaylov Nikolay & D. Perkins, Douglas (2011), Community Place Attachment and its Role in Social Capital Development.
26. Musa, Majd, (2013). Globalization, Identity, and the Urban Built Environment: A Theoretical Context, University of Sharjah.
27. Neal, Peter (2003), "Urban Village and the Making of Communities", Spon Press, London. [DOI:10.4324/9780203402771]
28. Origins and Consequences of Lesbian-Friendly Place Reputations for LBQ Migrants." Sexualities, Valume 20, Issue Pp 835-74. [DOI:10.1177/1363460716658407]
29. Patteson, M. E, & Williams, D. R, (2005), Maintaining Research tradition on place: Diversity of thought and scientific progress. Journal of Envioronmental Psychology, 25, 361-380. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.001]
30. Payton, Michelle Angela Payton (2003), Influence of Place Attachment and Social Capital on Civic Action: A Study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge, master on Civic Action: A Study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge Socialty past Identity Putrajaya .
31. Rapoport, Amos (1990) "Science and the Failure of Architecture" in Altman, I. & Christensen, K. Environment and behavior studies: emergence of intellectual traditions, Plenum Press [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-7944-7_5]
32. Robertson, D., Smyth, J., and Mclntosh, I (2010), Neighborhood identity: The path dependency of class and place, Housing, Theory and Society, Volume 27, Issue 3, Pp 258-273. [DOI:10.1080/14036090903326429]
33. Sadeghi habib abad, A.; Taher Tolou Del, M.S. and Mahdi Nejad, J. (2016). Recognition of Durability of Sacred Images' Nature in the Iran Islamic Traditional Architecture Based on Identification of the Stable identity of Iranian Congregational Mosques. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 4(2), 17-30. [in Persian].
34. Sara, M (2019), Shopping Streets and Neighborhood Identity: Retail Theming as Symbolic Ownership in New York, J City & Communty, Valume 18, Issue 4. [DOI:10.1111/cico.12465]
35. Seamon, David and Jacob Spwers (2008), Place and Placelessness (1976): Edward Relph, In Key Texts in Human Geography, Edited by Phil Hubbard, Rob Kitchin, and Gill Valentine, 43-51, Sage, London. [DOI:10.4135/9781446213742.n6]
36. Soini, Katriina; Hanne Vaarala and Eija Pouta (2012), Residents' Sense of Place and Landscape Perceptions at the Rural- Urban Interface, Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, pp 124-134. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002]
37. Ujang, Norsidah (2012), Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Valume 49, pp 156-167. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.014]
38. Walmsley. D.J (1990), Urban Living, Longman Scientific & Technical.pp:64.
39. Weeks, J (1990) The Value of Difference. In J. Rutherford (ed) Identity. London.
40. Williams, R., Daniel, J., & Vaske, Jerry, (2003). The Measurement of Place Attachment: Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach ,Forest science, Vol 49 (6), Pp 840- 830.
41. Woodward, K (1991), Concepts of Identity and Difference: London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage in association with the Open University.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
