Cultural heritage of the country
Abstract: (314 Views)
The common language of religious architecture in historical periods assumes the attitude of thought. It has played an important role in creating the architecture of Iranian mosques. The topic of this article is based on the thought hidden in religious architecture, despite the existence of theoretical foundations, a single explanation based on the knowledge of the inner nature of the audience and their attitude towards the surrounding environment and the architectural space of its definition has been created. The thought that explains the way of understanding the architectural space during the historical periods in the existential nature of man is important in terms of the foundation of architectural creation. The creation of architectural work is an appreciative revelation based on carrying a special idea and concept. The importance of this research is that until now, there has not been comprehensive and coherent research about the role of thought in the common language of the architecture of these mosques. Therefore, the current study aims to answer the main question "To what extent is the role of thought in creating a common language of architecture in the Kabud mosques of Tabriz and Sheikh Lutfullah in Isfahan?", Therefore, the current research method is based on logical reasoning, analytical-descriptive and library study, documents, historical documents related to the Kabud Mosque of Tabriz and Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque of Isfahan, field observations and the study of Burkhardt and Grabar's thoughts in this regard.
The opinions of Titus Burkhardt and Oleg Grabar about Islamic architecture, examining the attitude and perspective of these two architects for the formation of Islamic architecture, shows that Burkhardt considers the formation of architecture and its elements to be derived from the traditions of the Islamic religion. Still, Grabar uses Islam as a culture-building component along with other architectural factors. despite the difference in intellectual foundations in the two approaches the views of thinkers such as; Oleg Grabar and Titus Burkhardt in the field of mosque architecture, have investigated the attitude of thought in the mentioned mosques as a research object, to the formation of the common language of religious architecture in its most perfect example, the mosque. To study and get to know the Kabud Mosque of Tabriz and Sheikh Lutfullah of Isfahan, you can get a variety of information from written sources, and sources that comment on the artistic and architectural wonders of these two works especially. has been done, while in no treatise or book, the idea of building these two buildings, which were implemented in two different historical periods, has not been investigated directly or indirectly. The difference in the attitude of Burkhardt (traditionalist, semantic) and Grabar (believed history based on the teachings of Hegel's philosophy of history) to the hierarchy of mosque architecture caused them to have different views on the influence of religion in the formation of Islamic architecture. But the common points that exist in the opinions of Titus Burkhart and Oleg Grabar about Islamic architecture are:
We are emphasizing the importance of tradition and history in the formation of Islamic architecture.
He is emphasizing the relationship between architecture and the natural and geographical environment.
We are emphasizing the importance of light and shadow in Islamic architecture.
The use of artistic and aesthetic elements in Islamic architecture.
I was emphasizing the importance of open and internal spaces in Islamic architecture.
They were emphasizing the importance of interaction between internal and external spaces in Islamic architecture. The results show that the architecture of each period is influenced by outstanding ideas that are manifested in the body and form of mosques, and the role of thought in creating a common architectural language in these two mosques is very important. Although Burkhardt and Grabar have used different methods in explaining their ideas, for this reason, they explain the principles and elements of the building in different ways. However, they are unanimous in the role of Islam in creating religious architecture in Islamic lands. The results of the research indicate that the architecture of each period is influenced by a high thought that is manifested in the body and form and remains. Therefore, the role of thought in creating a common language behind the fundamental factors of architecture in both, despite the apparent differences, is affected by the separation and transition from the material world and the transition to the spiritual world in the intersection of the position of building and the position of reading.
The opinions of Titus Burkhardt and Oleg Grabar about Islamic architecture, examining the attitude and perspective of these two architects for the formation of Islamic architecture, shows that Burkhardt considers the formation of architecture and its elements to be derived from the traditions of the Islamic religion. Still, Grabar uses Islam as a culture-building component along with other architectural factors. despite the difference in intellectual foundations in the two approaches the views of thinkers such as; Oleg Grabar and Titus Burkhardt in the field of mosque architecture, have investigated the attitude of thought in the mentioned mosques as a research object, to the formation of the common language of religious architecture in its most perfect example, the mosque. To study and get to know the Kabud Mosque of Tabriz and Sheikh Lutfullah of Isfahan, you can get a variety of information from written sources, and sources that comment on the artistic and architectural wonders of these two works especially. has been done, while in no treatise or book, the idea of building these two buildings, which were implemented in two different historical periods, has not been investigated directly or indirectly. The difference in the attitude of Burkhardt (traditionalist, semantic) and Grabar (believed history based on the teachings of Hegel's philosophy of history) to the hierarchy of mosque architecture caused them to have different views on the influence of religion in the formation of Islamic architecture. But the common points that exist in the opinions of Titus Burkhart and Oleg Grabar about Islamic architecture are:
We are emphasizing the importance of tradition and history in the formation of Islamic architecture.
He is emphasizing the relationship between architecture and the natural and geographical environment.
We are emphasizing the importance of light and shadow in Islamic architecture.
The use of artistic and aesthetic elements in Islamic architecture.
I was emphasizing the importance of open and internal spaces in Islamic architecture.
They were emphasizing the importance of interaction between internal and external spaces in Islamic architecture. The results show that the architecture of each period is influenced by outstanding ideas that are manifested in the body and form of mosques, and the role of thought in creating a common architectural language in these two mosques is very important. Although Burkhardt and Grabar have used different methods in explaining their ideas, for this reason, they explain the principles and elements of the building in different ways. However, they are unanimous in the role of Islam in creating religious architecture in Islamic lands. The results of the research indicate that the architecture of each period is influenced by a high thought that is manifested in the body and form and remains. Therefore, the role of thought in creating a common language behind the fundamental factors of architecture in both, despite the apparent differences, is affected by the separation and transition from the material world and the transition to the spiritual world in the intersection of the position of building and the position of reading.
Keywords: Common language, religious architecture, thought, Kbud Mosque of Tabriz, Sheikh Lutfullah Mosque of Isfahan.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Definition of Islamic practical and theoretical wisdom in architecture and urbanism
Received: 2024/01/2 | Accepted: 2024/10/2
Received: 2024/01/2 | Accepted: 2024/10/2
References
1. منابع فارسی:
2. امام خمینی، 1371. شرح چهل حدیث. تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی.
3. عابدی جعفری، حسن، تسلیمی، محمدسعید، فقیهی، ابوالحسن، و شیخ زاده، محمد. 1390. تحلیل مضمون و شبکه مضامین: روشی ساده و کارآمد برای تبیین الگوهای موجود در داده های کیفی. اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی (اندیشه مدیریت)، 5(2 (پیاپی 10))، 151-198.
4. انصاری، مجتبی، نژاد ابراهیمی، احد. 1389. هندسه و تناسبات در معماری دوره ترکمانان قویونلو - مسجد کبود (فیروزه جهان اسلام). کتاب ماه علم و هنر 5(129)، 35 تا 45.
5. بمانیان، محمدرضا، پورجعفر، محمدرضا، احمدی، فریال و صادقی علیرضا. 1389. بازخوانی هویت معنوی و انگاره های قدسی در معماری مساجد شیعی. شیعه شناسی، 8(30)، 37-70.
6. دهخدا، علی اکبر، 1360، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
7. دهقانی تفتی، محسن، مدرس زاده، زهرا السادات، و معماریان، غلامحسین. 1400. ریشه یابی الگوی معماری مسجد کبود تبریز. مطالعات معماری ایران، 10(19 )، 5-23.
8. قیّومی بیدهندی، مهرداد. 1383. آثار و افکار الگ گرابار. دانشنامه، 3(2) ، 69-135.
9. حافظ بن کربلایی، حسین. قرن 10. روضات الجنان و جنت الجنان. ترجمه محمدامین سلطان القرایی. 1344. تبریز: نشر کتاب.
10. حق پرست، فرزین، نژادابراهیمی، احد. 1393. بازسازی تصوری مجموعه عمارت مظفریه تبریز (مسجد کبود) بر اساس اسناد و متون تاریخی. پژوهش هنر، 2(7)، 89-94.
11. ایمانی، نادیه. 1384. نقد تلقی مورخان از معماری اسلامی. گلستان هنر، 1(1)، 74-80.
12. کبیرصابر، محمدباقر، مظاهریان، حامد، و پیروی، مهناز. 1393. ریخت شناسی معماری مسجد کبود تبریز. مطالعات معماری ایران، -(6)، 5-23.
13. منصوری، سید امیر، تیموری محمود. 1394. نقد آرای سنّت گرایان معاصر در زمینه هنر و معماری اسلامی، با تکیه بر مفهوم سنّت در تعریف معماری اسلامی. فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، 1(1)، 1-14.
14. معین، محمد. 1351. لعت نامه معین. تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
15. موسوی گیلانی، سید رضی. 1400. مبنای معرفت شناختی تیتوس بورکهارت درباره هنر اسالمی و نقد نگرش الگ گرابار. عصر آدینه، 14(34)، 7-26.
16. ملاصدرا. 1341. اسرار آیات. ترجمه محمد خواجوی. 1360. تهران: انجمن حکمت و فلسفه.
17. نجفی زیارانی، سعید. 1378. جستجوی مفاهیم در معماری اسلامی (مسجد). در مجموعه مقالات همایش معماری مساجد گذشته-حال-آینده، تهران، زمستان، 12 تا 24 آذر.
18. نصر، سید حسین. 1375. هنر و معنویت اسلامی. ترجمه رحیم قاسمیان. 1380. تهران: دفتر مطالعات، دفتر مطالعات دینی، هنر.
19. نصری، عبدالله. 1381. انسان شناسی حکمت خالده به روایت سید حسین نصر، قبسات،44.
20. پیرنیا، محمد باقر. 1383. سبک شناسی معماری ایرانی. تهران: انتشارات معمار.
21. پورهادی حسینی، میرمحمدجواد، بلیلان اصل، لیدا، طوفان، سحر، و پاکدل فرد، محمدرضا. 1400. تداوم اندیشه, زبان مشترک معماری مجموعه های مذهبی دارالسلطنه تبریز از قرن 7-9 ه. ق. مطالعات تاریخ اسلام. 13(48 )، 39-60.
22. پورحسن، قاسم. 1385. ویتگنشتاین: از زبان تصویری تا زبان تألیفی. پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، 4(49)، 127-148.
23. پورمند، حسنعلی. 1386. تأثیر تفکر فلسفی بر طراحی معماری معاصر. رساله دکتری معماری. دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی.
24. پورجعفر، محمدرضا، اکبریان، رضا، انصاری، مجتبی، و پورمند، حسنعلی. 1388. مطالعه معماری ایران با رویکرد اندیشه فلسفی. مجله علوم انسانی، 16(2)، 87-114.
25. رئیس زاده، مهناز. 1380. اعجاز و ایجاز رنگ در فضاسازی مسجد ایرانی. مجموعه مقالات دومین همایش بین المللی معماری مساجد افق آینده، دانشگاه هنر، ج 1 ، 395-405.
26. جلالی، سید هادی، طهوری، نیر و اعتصام، ایرج. 1400. مطالعه تطبیقی سنت گرایی و تاریخی گری در تبیین معماری مسجد با تمرکز بر آراء تیتوس بورکهارت و الگ گرابار. فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، 6(2)، 113-132.
27. طبسی، محسن، و فاضل نسب، فهیمه. (1391). بازشناسی نقش و تاثیر جریا ن های فکری عصر صفوی در شکل گیری ورودی مساجد مکتب اصفهان. معماری و شهرسازی (هنرهای زیبا)، 17(3)، 81-90.
28. طهوری، نیر. 1386. نماد و نشانه در تفسیر معماری اسلامی. گلستان هنر، 3(3)، 13-25.
29. وهاب زاده، عبدالرحمن. 1385. مسجد کابل، دیروز، امروز. در سومین کنگره تاریخ معماری و شهرسازی ایران، کرمان، اسپانیا، 4-19.
30. زکاء، یحیی 1365. شهرهای ایران. تبریز: چاپخانه فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی با همکاری انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
31. Imam Khomeini. 1992. Description of forty hadiths. Tehran: Imam Khomeini Editing and Publishing Institute. Press [Persian]. (Imam Khomeini 1992).
32. Abedi Jafari. H. Taslimi, M. S. Faghihi, A. Sheikhzadeh, M. 2011. A simple and efficient way to explain patterns in qualitative data: Strategic management thought, 2(10): 151-198. Press [Persian]. (Abedi Jafari, 2011).
33. Ansari. M. and Nejad Ebrahimi. A. 2010. Geometry and proportions in the architecture of the Turkoman period of Agh Quyunlu ha Kabud Mosque (Turquoise World of Islam). The book of the month of science and art 5(129). Press [Persian]. (Ansari and Nejâd Ebrahimi 2010).
34. Bemaniyan. M. R. M. R. Pourjafar, F. Ahmadi, A. and R. Sadeghi. 2009. Reinterpretation of spiritual identity and holy concepts in the architecture of Shiite mosques. Journal of Shia Studies 8(30): 37-70. Press [Persian]. (Bemaniyan et al. 2009).
35. Dehkhoda. Ali. Akbar. 1981. Dehkhoda dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran publication. Press [Persian]. (Dehkhoda 1981).
36. Dehghani Tafti. M. Madraszadeh. Z. Memarian. GH. 2021. Finding the roots of the architectural model of Tabriz KABUD Mosque, 5(19): 5-23. Press [Persian]. (Dehghani Tafti, 2021).
37. Gayumi Bidhendi, Mehrdad. 2004. Oleg Grabar's works and thoughts. Journal of Daneshname 17(3): 69-135. Press [Persian]. (Gayumi Bidhendi 2004).
38. Hafez Ibn Karbalayi. Hossein. 10th century. Ruzat al-Jannân and Janat al-Jannan. Translated by Mohammad Amin Soltan al-Gharayi. 1965. Tabriz: book publication. Press [Persian]. (Hafez Ibn Karbalayi 1965).
39. Hagh Parast. F. and Nejad Ebrahimi, A. 2014. Imaginary reconstruction of Tabriz's Mozafaria mansion complex based on historical documents and texts. Journal of Art Research 2(7): 89-94. Press [Persian]. (Hagh Parast and Nejad Ebrahimi 2014).
40. Imani. N. 2005. Criticism of historians' perception of Islamic architecture. GHolestan-e-Honar. 1 (1): 74-80. Press [Persian]. (Imani 2005).
41. Kabir Saber. M.B. H. Mazaheriyan, and M. Peyravi. 2010. Architectural Morphology of Tabriz Blue Mosque. Iranian Architectural Studies. 1(6): 5-23. Press [Persian]. (Kabir Saber, M.B. H. Mazaheriyan, and M. Peyravi 2010).
42. Based upon the concept of the tradition in Definition of Islamic Architecture. CIAUJ. 1 (1) .1-14. Press [Persian]. (Mansouri 2015).
43. Mansouri, S.A. Teimouri M. 2015. Criticism on the Opinions of Contemporary Traditionalists in Islamic Art and Architecture; Based upon the concept of the tradition in Definition of Islamic Architecture. CIAUJ. 1
44. (1) .1-14. Press [Persian]. (Mansouri 2015).
45. Moin. Muhammad. 1972. Moin dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications. press [Persian]. (Moin 1972).
46. Mousavi Gilani. S. 2021. Titus Burckhardt's epistemological basis for Islamic art and attitude criticism Oleg Grabar. 14(34): 7-26. Press [Persian]. (Mousavi Gilani 2021).
47. Mulla Sadra. 1633. Mysteries of Verses. Translated by Mohammad Khvajawi. 1981. Tehran: Wisdom and Philosophy Association. Press [Persian]. (Mulla Sadra 1981).
48. Najafi Ziyarani, Said. 1999. A search for concepts in Islamic architecture (mosque). In Proceedings of Past-Present-Future Mosque Architecture Conference, Tehrân, Winter, 12-24 December. Press [Persian]. (Najafi ziyarani 1999).
49. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 1996. Islamic art and spirituality. Translated by Rahim Ghasemiyan. 2001. Tehrân: Office of Studies, Office of Religious Studies, Art. press [Persian]. (Nasr 1996).
50. Nasri, Abdullah. 2003. Anthropology of Philosophia Perennis narrated by Seyed Hossein Nasr. Qabasat. 44. 87-106. Press [Persian]. (Nasri 2003).
51. Pirniya, Mohammad Bagher. 2004. Iranian architectural stylistics. Tehran: Memar Publications. Press [Persian]. (Pirniya 2004).
52. Pourhadi, M. M. Balilan. A. l. Tofan. S. and Pakdel. M. 2020. Continuity of the thought of the common architectural language of the religious complexes of Tabriz Dar al-Saltane from the 7th to the 9th lunar century. Islamic history studies 53(48): 39-60. Press [Persian]. (Pourhadi et al, 2020).
53. Pourhasan. Ghasem. 2006. Wittgenstein: from visual language to written language. Journal of Humanities 4(49): 127-148. Press [Persian]. (Pourhasan 2006).
54. Pourmand. H. 2007. The influence of philosophical thought in contemporary architectural design. PhD diss., Ministry of Science, Research and Technology - Tarbiat Modares University - Faculty of Arts. Press [Persian]. (Pourmand et al, 2009).
55. Pourmand. H. Pourjafar. M. R. Akbariyan. R. and Ansari, M. 2009. The study of Iranian architecture with the approach of philosophical thought. Journal of Humanities 16 (2): 87-114. Press [Persian]. (Pourmand 2007)
56. Rais Zadeh. Mahnaz. and Hossein Mofid. 1999. Mosque in urban architecture and depreciation of Qible deviation. Tehran: Art University. Press [Persian]. (Rais Zadeh and Mofid 1999).
57. Jalali, S.H. Tahoori. N. Etessam. I. 2021. A Comparative Study of Traditionalism and Historiography in the Explanation of Mosque Architecture by Focusing on the notions of Titus Burckhardt and Oleg Grabar's Model. Farhang-e- Memari & Shahrsazi. 6(2): 113-132. Press [Persian]. (Seyed Hadi 2021). [DOI:10.52547/ciauj.6.2.113]
58. Tabasi. M. and Fazelnasab. F. 2014. Recognizing the role and influence of intellectual currents of the Safavid era in forming the entrance of Isfahan school mosques. Journal of Fine Arts 17(3): 81-90. Press [Persian]. (Tabasi and and Fazelnasab 1999).
59. Tahoori. N. 2007. Symbols and semiotics in the interpretation of Islamic architecture. Gholestan-e-Honar. 3(9):13-25. Press [Persian]. (Tahoori 2007).
60. Vahab Zade. Abdol al-Rahman. 2006. Kabul Mosque, yesterday, today. In The Third Congress of the History of Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, Kerman, Spain, 4-19. Press [Persian]. (Vahab Zade 2006).
61. Zoka. Yahya. 1986. Cities of Iran. Tabriz: Islamic culture and guidance printing house in cooperation with academic Jihad publications. Press [Persian]. (Zoka 1986).
62. Braun, V. Clarke, V. 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2. 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
63. Burckhardt, T. 1986. Art of Islam: Language and Meaning. (M. Rajabnia, Trans.). Soroush Publications. Press [Persian]. (Burckhardt 1986).
64. Burckhardt, T. 1987. Mirror of the Intellect: Essays on Traditional Science and Sacred Art, New York: State University of New York Press. (Burckhardt 1987).
65. Burckhardt, T. 1991. Perennial Values in Islamic Art. (S.M. Avini, Trans.). in: Immortality and Art. Barg Publication. (Burckhardt 1991).
66. Burckhardt. T. 1993 a collection of essays on the basics of spiritual art, compiled by Ali Tajdini, Tehran Islamic Propaganda Organization. Press [Persian]. (Burckhardt et al. 1993).
67. Grabar. O. Ettinghausen. R. 2022. The Art and Architecture of Islam. Translate by: Yagoob Azhand. Tehran: Samt. Press [Persian]. (Grabar 2022).
68. Grabar, O. 2000. The Formation of Islamic Art. (M. Vahdati Daneshmand, Trans.). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. Press [Persian]. (Grabar 2000).
69. Hegel, G. W. F. 1998. Aesthetics, Lectures on Fine Art. (T. M. Knox Trans.). Clarendon Press. Oxford, New York, vol. 1.
70. 9.Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. 2007. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
71. Jackson, Peter. and Lawrence Lockhart. 1968. The Cambridge History of Iran. Translated by Teymur Ghaderi. 2011. Tehran. Book City. Press [Persian]. (Jackson and Lockhart 2011).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
