Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Roosta

Seyed Abdolhadi Daneshpour, Marym Roosta,
Volume 1, Issue 1 (3-2014)
Abstract

Title “sustainable society”, was first time propounded in the format of the conceptual framework of sustainable development as the final objective of social aspect of sustainable development. By now, many researches have studied this point that what specifications and characteristics a sustainable society should have and how urban planning can help creation of a sustainable society. However what have been ignored is local relation of these specifications in the shadow of the dominant ideology and the cultural bed of our society. It is clear that using each global pattern in local coordinates requires some changes proportioned to the cultural field of that place. According to this, using global pattern of “sustainable society” in the bed of Islamic culture requires redefining specifications of a sustainable society from the view of Islamic ideology. Therefore, the main problem of current writing is the way and how the indicators of sustainable society in Islamic ideology affect the urban planning tradition of Muslims. According to this, the main questions of this paper can be explained as: “what are the indicators of a sustainable society in the view of Islam”? and “what effects have had these indicators on urban planning tradition in the cities of Muslims”? The objective of this paper is to achieve a conceptual pattern from sustainable society in the bed of Islamic culture in a way that it can be used in promotion of urban plans and programs by the Islamic-Iranian approach. For this, while investigating the texts and documents in two fields of Islamic ideology and tradition of Muslims’ cities, the codes relating to social sustainability were extracted and categorized by help of “content analysis” method. Then the proportion of Islam’s social principles and its effects on urban planning tradition of Muslims was explained in a matrix. At the end, the conceptual framework of paper which responds to the primary questions and in which the process of design and planning of an urban planning place provided by emphasis on social principles in Islam’s ideology are compiled.


Ph.d Mahsa Sholeh, Ph.d Maryam Roosta, Zahra Hedayatimoghadam,
Volume 9, Issue 3 (9-2021)
Abstract

The phenomenon of urban development has transformed existing cities and put the protection of historical heritage at the core of urban planning. However, considering the traditional concepts of heritage, which place valuable historical elements separately in a broader urban context, does not meet the goals of heritage protection to protect the character and importance of historical heritage. Thus, the change in the scale of heritage protection arose from the challenges of heritage protection, and the consequence was the emergence of the heritage urban landscape approach (HUL). The concept of integration was also considered in order to create a balance between protection and development approaches.
Any new construction project in the vicinity or in the Buffer Zones of the Heritage Site potentially has visual effects on the historical heritage that allow for the evaluating and evaluation of adverse effects before and during the implementation can be providing an effective strategy to minimize or mitigate adverse effects. In order to provide a solution, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee has proposed a method of heritage impact assessment. To satisfactorily assess of these potential threats, the organization suggests the investigating impact of these threats on Outstanding Universal Value.
This study seeks to application Heritage Impact Assessment Framework to evaluating the Visual-Physical Integrity of the valuable heritage complex, Zandieh's Shiraz Complex as a case study examine. The present study is applied in terms of purpose and uses a qualitative approach to achieve its goals. Inheritance effects in Zandieh's Shiraz Complex have been done by considering three criteria of lack of protection and mismanagement, sensitivity of features and severity of effects in three scales of valuable building complex; space organization; morphology and visual organization. This assessment shows that the result of the intensity of the effects for the first scale is 2.37, the second scale is 4.66 and the third scale is 5, which has seriously damaged the collection in these dimensions. Also, the priority matrix of effects shows that the first scale has low damage and the second and third scales have severe damage and have a very high priority for providing solutions for the protection of historical heritage.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iran University of Science & Technology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb