Volume 12, Issue 2 (6-2024)
JRIA 2024, 12(2): 96-114 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khorsand R, Omranzadeh B, Motahar R. An analysis of high-rise constructi on in Iran: consequences, disadvantages and strategies (Criticizing the approval of the supreme council of urbanism and architecture of Iran regarding the location and criterias and regulations for the construction of high-rise buildings in the city of Tehran). JRIA 2024; 12 (2) :96-114
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1731-en.html
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1731-en.html
Abstract: (5465 Views)
High-rise construction is one of the controversial issues in the urbanism, both theoretically and practically. The various opinions and the agreements and oppositions that exist for it and the need to take a correct position on this matter indicate the necessity of analysis and Critique of this issue. What makes the issue more sensitive in a country like Iran is the connection between identity, culture, Islamic-Iranian lifestyle and religious beliefs with high-rise construction. The approval of the supreme council of urbanism and architecture of Iran regarding the location and criterias and regulations for the construction of high-rise buildings in the city of Tehran (1400) and its content also doubles the need to investigate this issue. Therefore, these questions are raised: What are the consequences of high-rise development in physiological, social, economic, transportation and traffic, environmental, physical and visual dimensions, and how it is evaluated from the perspective of Islamic worldview, Islamic culture and jurisprudence? How has the approval of the Supreme Council of Urbanism and Architecture of Iran paid attention to the results of various researches and the values of Islamic worldview, Islamic-Iranian culture and Islamic jurisprudence in relation to high-rise construction? What strategies can be pursued to avoid the disadvantages of high-rise construction in the country?
The purpose of the current research is to provide an analysis and explanation of the consequences of high-rise construction in the country with an identity and cultural perspective and with an emphasis on the criteria of Islamic worldview, as well as criticizing the approval of the supreme council of urbanism and architecture of Iran, and finally to provide appropriate strategies for high-rise construction. This is achieved by examining the history of high-rise construction in the world and Iran, meta-analysis of various researches on the evaluation of consequences of high-rise construction and precision in the opinions of researchers in this field.
The results of the research indicate that high-rise construction - especially in residential use - in spite of the benefits have been mentioned for it, works against its primary goals in the long run and it imposes various negative effects in terms of physical-spatial, environmental, transportation, social, economic, landscape, etc. on the city and citizens. Examining the criteria, principles and values of the Islamic worldview, Islamic-Iranian culture and lifestyle, and jurisprudential opinions also show that high-rise construction conflicts with them from various aspects. This has left extensive damages in social interactions, lifestyle, quality of people life and especially the foundation of the family. Therefore, the development and promotion of high-rise construction is not logical, it does not improve the quality of living in the city, but it also causes its degradation. So, the action of the supreme council of urbanism and architecture in approving the high-rise construction permit in Tehran is not evaluated positively and can be the source of future problems for Tehran. The recent resolution of this council is flawed in terms of theoretical approaches, necessity, goals, possibility, implementation guarantee and content. Most of the goals that are mentioned in the justification of this resolution are due to the acceptance of the current flawed trend governing economic relations in cities, especially in the field of land and housing, which is based on capitalists' speculation, personal gain, monopoly and hoarding in the land and housing market. Clearly, the consequence of such a view results in high-rise construction. While in this regard, it is necessary to reform the economic system of the cities and eliminate the brokerage and speculation market, and the realization of the goals should be sought in them. According to the studies, the following strategies and solutions are presented to solve the damage of high-rise construction and to move away from this model:
The purpose of the current research is to provide an analysis and explanation of the consequences of high-rise construction in the country with an identity and cultural perspective and with an emphasis on the criteria of Islamic worldview, as well as criticizing the approval of the supreme council of urbanism and architecture of Iran, and finally to provide appropriate strategies for high-rise construction. This is achieved by examining the history of high-rise construction in the world and Iran, meta-analysis of various researches on the evaluation of consequences of high-rise construction and precision in the opinions of researchers in this field.
The results of the research indicate that high-rise construction - especially in residential use - in spite of the benefits have been mentioned for it, works against its primary goals in the long run and it imposes various negative effects in terms of physical-spatial, environmental, transportation, social, economic, landscape, etc. on the city and citizens. Examining the criteria, principles and values of the Islamic worldview, Islamic-Iranian culture and lifestyle, and jurisprudential opinions also show that high-rise construction conflicts with them from various aspects. This has left extensive damages in social interactions, lifestyle, quality of people life and especially the foundation of the family. Therefore, the development and promotion of high-rise construction is not logical, it does not improve the quality of living in the city, but it also causes its degradation. So, the action of the supreme council of urbanism and architecture in approving the high-rise construction permit in Tehran is not evaluated positively and can be the source of future problems for Tehran. The recent resolution of this council is flawed in terms of theoretical approaches, necessity, goals, possibility, implementation guarantee and content. Most of the goals that are mentioned in the justification of this resolution are due to the acceptance of the current flawed trend governing economic relations in cities, especially in the field of land and housing, which is based on capitalists' speculation, personal gain, monopoly and hoarding in the land and housing market. Clearly, the consequence of such a view results in high-rise construction. While in this regard, it is necessary to reform the economic system of the cities and eliminate the brokerage and speculation market, and the realization of the goals should be sought in them. According to the studies, the following strategies and solutions are presented to solve the damage of high-rise construction and to move away from this model:
- Short-term strategies and solutions:
- Exclusion of high-rise buildings to commercial, office and similar uses in specific and planned areas and serious avoidance of allocating them to residential use.
- Revision of high-rise construction criteria based on Islamic values and the qualities of Islamic-Iranian architecture and urbanism.
- Prevision of the supervisory institution with a detailed description of duties to monitor the implementation of high-rise construction criteria and also the provision of effective punitive policies in order to prevent the occurrence of violations.
- Prevision of financial and tax mechanisms to eliminate hoarding of land and housing.
- Provision of necessary services and infrastructure, especially in the field of transportation and urban traffic in high-rise built-up areas.
- Long-term strategies and solutions:
- Revision of land preparation plan considering the existence of sufficient land in Iran and the possibility of sustainable and regulated horizontal expansion of cities and settlements.
- Adopting economic measures based on Islamic teachings in order to convert land, building and housing from capital goods to consumer goods.
- Extraction of urban development patterns based on Islamic-Iranian identity and culture and by using the historical records and experiences of cities and hidden semantic values in them.
- Revival of suitable agricultural, industrial and commercial areas and directing the population of metropolises, especially Tehran, to these areas.
- Laying the foundation for increasing production and providing facilities for residents of villages and small and medium towns to prevent migration to metropolises and increase reverse migration.
- Revival of the neighborhood system in the existing high-rise built-up areas and creation the basis for increasing the socio-cultural interactions of high-rise buildings residents, in order to reduce the socio-cultural damages.
Keywords: High-rise construction, Islamic-Iranian city, Islamic worldview, Supreme council of urbanism and architecture, Urban Living qualities.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Analysis of art and architectural schools based on Islamic view
Received: 2023/12/23 | Accepted: 2024/04/20 | Published: 2024/07/14
Received: 2023/12/23 | Accepted: 2024/04/20 | Published: 2024/07/14
References
1. ۱- اراکی، محسن. 139۷. فقه عمران شهری، قم: مجمع الفکر الاسلامی.
2. ۲- امین زاده، بهناز. 1377. تأثیرات ساختمان های بلند بر محیط شهری (طرح پژوهشی)، دانشکده محیط زیست، دانشگاه تهران.
3. ۳- ایروانی، جواد و همکاران. 1390. فرهنگ روابط اجتماعی در آموزه های اسلامی، مشهد: انتشارات دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی.
4. ۴- بحرینی، سید حسین. 1393. تجدد، فراتجدد و پس از آن در شهرسازی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
5. ۵- بهزادفر، مصطفی؛ علیالحسابی، مهران و فتحی، سمیه. 1397. تدقیق و بازتعریف شاخصههای انسجام کالبدی- اجتماعی محله در مجموعههای مسکونی بلندمرتبه، فصلنامه مدیریت شهری، شماره 50، صص 255-237.
6. ۶- پیرنیا، محمدکریم. 1394. آشنایی با معماری اسلامی ایران، تهران: انتشارات غلامحسین معماریان.
7. ۷- جوادی آملی، عبدالله. 1394. مفاتیح الحیات، قم: انتشارات اسراء.
8. ۸- جوادی آملی، عبدالله. 1399. اسلام و محیط زیست، قم: انتشارات اسراء.
9. ۹- رئیسی، محمدمنان. 1397. معماری و شهرسازی مطابق با سبک زندگی اسلامی، انتشارات دانشگاه قم.
10. ۱۰- شجاعی، محمد؛ پولادی، پیمان. 1398. مطالعه ضرورتها و چالشهای بلندمرتبهسازی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان چالوس)، فصلنامه جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، دوره 2، شماره 1، صص 149-132.
11. ۱۱- شماعی، علی؛ جهانی، رحمان. 1390. بررسی اثرات توسعه عمودی شهر بر هویت محلهای )مطالعه موردی: منطقه 7 تهران(، فصلنامه شهر ایرانی اسلامی، شماره 6، صص 82-73.
12. ۱۲- صادقزاده، اکبر. 1376. نقدی بر اندیشه ساختمانهای بلند در ایران، نشریه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، شماره 5، صص 117-101.
13. ۱۳- طباطبایی، سید محمد حسین. 1397. روابط اجتماعی در اسلام، ترجمه محمد جواد حجتی کرمانی، قم: مؤسسه بوستان کتاب.
14. ۱۴- عزیزی، محمدمهدی. 1377. ارزیابی اثرات کالبدی- فضایی برجسازی در تهران: محلات فرمانیه- کامرانیه، مجله هنرهای زیبا، شماره 4 و 5، صص 46-33.
15. ۱۵- عزیزی، محمدمهدی؛ ملکمحمدنژاد، صارم. 1386. بررسی تطبیقی دو الگوی مجتمعهای مسکونی متعارف و بلندمرتبه، مطالعه موردی: مجتمعهای مسکونی نور(سئول) و اسکان تهران، نشریه هنرهای زیبا، شماره 32، صص 38-27.
16. ۱۶- عظیمی آقداش، محمد. 1394. ضوابط بلندمرتبهسازی: ویژه آزمونهای نظام مهندسی (معماری و طراحی)، تهران: نوآور.
17. ۱۷- فردوسی، سجاد؛ سمیری، تارا؛ طبسی، ایمان. 1394. پیامدهای محیطی ناشی از افزایش تراکم و بلندمرتبهسازی در شهرها، فصلنامه مطالعات محیطی هفت حصار، شماره 12، صص 68-59.
18. ۱۸- فرهودی، رحمتاله؛ محمدی، علیرضا. 1380. تاثیر احداث ساختمانهای بلندمرتبه بر کاربریهای شهری مطالعه موردی مناطق 1، 2 و 3 شهر تهران، فصلنامه پژوهشهای جغرافیایی، شماره 41، صص 82-71.
19. ۱۹- محمدزادهسقطی، شادی؛ حقلسان، محمود. 1395. نگاهی بر نقش بلندمرتبهسازی در تحققپذیری توسعه پایدار شهری، کنفرانس بینالمللی نخبگان عمران، معماری و شهرسازی، دوره اول، تهران.
20. ۲۰- مرتضی، هشام. 1387. اصول سنتی ساخت و ساز در اسلام، ترجمه دکتر ابوالفضل مشکینی و دکتر کیومرث حبیبی، تهران: مرکز مطالعاتی و تحقیقاتی شهرسازی و معماری.
21. ۲۱- مرکز مطالعات و برنامه ریزی شهر تهران. 1399. گزارش نشست تخصصی اجرای برنامه انتقال حق توسعه در شهر تهران.
22. ۲۲- مستاجران گورتانی، مسلم؛ برکاتی، سیده آیدا. 1398. واکاوی استفاده از سیستمهای دیاگرید (سازمانهای نوین) در ساختمانهای بلندمرتبه با رویکرد معماری پارامتریک، نمونه پژوهش: ساختمان سوئیسری لندن، نشریه معماریشناسی، شماره 9، صص 48-39.
23. ۲۳- مطهر، رضا؛ دانشپور، سید عبدالهادی؛ شکوهیبیدهندی، محمدصالح. 1400. بررسی تطبیقی معیارهای کرامت انسانی به عنوان یکی از ویژگیهای شهر مطلوب اسلامی در محله های نوساز و قدیمی؛ (مورد پژوهشی: محله های حکیمیه و خیابان ایران شهر تهران)، نشریه پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی، دوره 10، شماره 1، صص 100-79.
24. ۲۴- منعام، محمدرضا؛ ضرابیان، فرناز. 1386. بررسی اثرات کالبدی-فضایی بلندمرتبهسازی درشهر، نشریه شهرداری، شماره 82، صص 107-102.
25. ۲۵- میرمقتدایی، مهتا و حق شناس، ساناز. 1400. مروری بر بومی سازی سیاست توسعه مبتنی بر حمل و نقل همگانی در ایران، از نظریه تا عمل، فصلنامه علمی مهندسی ساختمان و علوم مسکن، دوره چهاردهم، شماره 25، صص 42-31.
26. ۲۶- نقی زاده، محمد. 1387. شهر و معماری اسلامی (تجلیات و عینیات)، اصفهان: انتشارات مانی.
27. Aminzadeh, Behnaz. 1998. The effects of high-rise buildings on the urban environment, faculty of environment, university of Tehran.
28. Appleyard, D. and Fishman, L. 1977. High rise buildings versus San Francisco: measuring visual and symbolic impacts. InD. Conway (Ed.), human response to tall buildings. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, pp. 101-112.
29. Araki, Mohsen. 2018. Jurisprudence of urban construction, Qom: Majma-olfekr Al-Islami
30. Azimi Aghdash, Mohamad. 2015. Rules of high-rise construction, Tehran: Noavar Press.
31. Azizi, Mohamad Mahdi. 1999. Evaluation of the physical-spatial effects of tower construction in Tehran: Farmanieh-Kamranieh neighborhoods, Journal of Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, No. 4&5, Page(s) 33-46.
32. Azizi, Mohammad Mahdi; Malek Mohammadnezhad, Saaram. 2007. Comparative study on high-rise and conventional residential complexes: the cases of Nour (Seoul) and Eskan complexes in Tehran, Journal of Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, No. 32, Page(s) 27-38.
33. Bahrainy, Hossein. 2014. Modernism, postmodernism, and after in urban design and planning, Tehran: university of Tehran Press.
34. Behzadfar, Mostafa; Alalhesabi, Mehran and Fathi, Somayeh. 2018. Identify and redefine the indicators of physical and social coherence of neighborhoods in high-rise residential complexes, Journal of urban management, No. 50, Page(s) 237-255.
35. Council on tall buildings and urban habitat. 1995. Structural systems for tall buildings. Committee 3, McGraw-Hill book company, New York, p. 283.
36. Farhoudi, Rahmat-al-llah; Mohammadi, Alireza. 2001. Effect of tall-buildings on urban land use case study: the city of Tehran (Zones of 1, 2, 3), Journal of geographical researchs, No. 41, Page(s) 71-82.
37. Ferdosi, Sajjad; Samiri, Tara; Tabasi, Iman. 2015. Environmental conscequences increasing density and height of buildings in cities, Journal of Haft Hesar environmental studies, No. 12, Page(s) 59-68.
38. GELB, P. 1977. High-rise impact on city and neighbourhood livability, In D. Conway (Ed.), human response to tall buildings. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, pp. 131-149.
39. Iravani, Javad et al. 2011. The culture of social relations in Islamic teachings, Mashhad: Razavi University of Islamic Scinces Press.
40. Javadi Amoli, Abdollah. 2015, Mafatih al-hayat, Qom: Asra Press.
41. Javadi Amoli, Abdollah. 2020, Islam and the environment, Qom: Asra Press.
42. Mirmoghtadaee, Mahta; Haghshenas, Sanaz. 2021. Localization of Transit-Oriented Development policy in Iran, from concept to reality, Journal of building engineering and housing science, Vol. 14, No. 25, Page(s) 31-42.
43. Mohammadzadeh Saghati, Shadi; Haghlesan, Mahmoud. 2016. View on role of a tall building in the realization of urban sustainable development, 1st International conference of civil architecture and urban planning elites, Tehran.
44. Monam, Mohammad Reza; Zarabian, Farnaz. 2007. Investigating the physical-spatial effects of high-rise construction in the city, Journal of municipalities, No. 82, Page(s) 102-107.
45. Mortada, Hisham. 2008. Traditional Islamic principles of built environment, translated by Abolfazl Meshkini and kyoumars Habibi, Tehran: Urban planning & Architecture Research Center of Iran Press.
46. Mostajeran Gourtani, Moslem; Barekati, Aida. 2019. Analyzing the use of diagrid systems in high-rise buildings with a parametric architecture approach, case study: Swiss RE building in London, Journal of architecture, No. 9, Page(s) 39-48.
47. Motahar Reza, Daneshpour, Seyed Abdolhadi, Shokouhibidhendi, Mohammad Saleh. 2022. A comparative study of human dignity criteria in the new and old neighborhoods of Hakimieh and Iran Street of Tehran, Journal of researches in Islamic architecture, Vol. 10, No. 1 Page(s) 79-100. [DOI:10.52547/jria.10.1.5]
48. Naghizadeh, Mohammad. 2008. Islamic city and architecture (manifestations and expressions), 1st editin, Isfahan: Mani Press.
49. Pirnia, Mohammad Karim. 2016. Familiarity with Iranian Islamic architecture, Tehran: Gholamhosien Memarian Press.
50. Raeisi, Mohammad Mannan. 2018. Architecture and urbanism in accordance with Islamic lifestyle, Qom: University of Qom Press.
51. Sadeghzadeh, Akbar. 1997. A critique on the idea of high-rise buildings in Iran, Journal of geography and urban Planning, No. 5, Page(s) 101-117.
52. Shamai, Ali; Jahani, Rahman. 2012. Investigating the effects of vertical development of the city on neighborhood identity (Case study: District 7 of Tehran), Journal of Iranian Islamic city studies, No. 6, Page(s) 73-82.
53. Shojai, Mohammad; Poladi, Peiman. 2019. Study of the Needs and Challenges of a High-Rise Process (Case Study: Chalus Town), Journal of geography and human relationships, Vol. 2, No. 1, Page(s) 132-149.
54. Tabataba'I, Mohammad Hossein. 2018. Social relations in Islam, translated by Mohammad Javad Hojjati Kermani, 5th edition, Qom: Boustane Ketab Press.
55. Tehran urban research and planning center. Report of the specialized meeting on the implementation of the transfer of development rights program in Tehran.
56. Oxford university official website. 2015. Oxford dictionaries (language matters). [Online] 2015. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com.
57. Wood, Antony. 2007. Sustainability: a new high-rise vernacular. The structural design of tall and special buildings 16; URL: http//www.interscience.wiley.com. [DOI:10.1002/tal.425]
58. Wood, Antony. 2010. New paradigms in high-raise design. Council on tall buildings and urban habitat journal (CTBUH review). Issue No.3, Chicago, USA, pp. 15-18.
59. Woodworth, A. Vernon ,Hastings, K. S. 2014. Massachusetts State Building Code 8th Edition. Charlestown : R. W. Sullivan, IncR. Inc., 2014. www.rwsullivan.com.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
